ME-001 · EXPERIMENT PROTOCOL
Accumulation of mirror energy
An investigation into the interaction between a reflected gaze and physical effort
The first experiment based on the author’s theory of mirror energy. Its objective is to record observable and subjective changes in a person’s state when combining two actions: physical exercise and focusing on one’s own eyes as seen in a reflection.
Status: research protocol. Results are to be recorded and analyzed.
The first experiment based on the author’s theory of mirror energy. Its objective is to record observable and subjective changes in a person’s state when combining two actions: physical exercise and focusing on one’s own eyes as seen in a reflection.
Status: research protocol. Results are to be recorded and analyzed.
1. Objective and hypothesis
Purpose of the experiment
To investigate whether performing physical exercises in front of a mirror while focusing one’s gaze on one’s own reflected eyes is accompanied by changes in a person’s subjective state.
Working hypothesis
The combination of physical exertion and visual concentration may be accompanied by shifts in sensation, attention, or emotional state that differ from those experienced when performing either activity in isolation.
This hypothesis does not presuppose the existence of a distinct physical form of energy. Any observations must be evaluated against established explanations, including physical strain, attentional focus, expectations, and emotional response.
Key research questions
Initial parameter
The number N of push-ups was chosen based on the personal backstory of how the idea originated. It holds no specific, predetermined significance. This parameter can only be evaluated by performing the exercises safely and comparing the results.
Criterion of integrity: record all observations, including the absence of changes and results that do not align with expectations.
Purpose of the experiment
To investigate whether performing physical exercises in front of a mirror while focusing one’s gaze on one’s own reflected eyes is accompanied by changes in a person’s subjective state.
Working hypothesis
The combination of physical exertion and visual concentration may be accompanied by shifts in sensation, attention, or emotional state that differ from those experienced when performing either activity in isolation.
This hypothesis does not presuppose the existence of a distinct physical form of energy. Any observations must be evaluated against established explanations, including physical strain, attentional focus, expectations, and emotional response.
Key research questions
- What changes does a person notice during and after the practice?
- Do the sensations experienced when combining two actions differ from those felt when performing each action separately?
- Are the observations consistent when repeated under comparable conditions?
- What role might factors such as fatigue, mood, expectations, and the specific way an exercise is performed play?
- Does a specific number (N) result in any reproducible differences compared to other repetition counts?
Initial parameter
The number N of push-ups was chosen based on the personal backstory of how the idea originated. It holds no specific, predetermined significance. This parameter can only be evaluated by performing the exercises safely and comparing the results.
Criterion of integrity: record all observations, including the absence of changes and results that do not align with expectations.
2. Terms and procedures for conducting
Preparation
To begin, order an "original" (high-quality) mirror—a standard glass pane with a premium silver coating (amalgam) that ensures an accurate, distortion-free reflection and high moisture resistance. Next, ensure the mirror is positioned securely, and that there is sufficient clear space and a safe surface for performing the exercise.
I record the date, time, duration of sleep, physical well-being, mood, and level of fatigue. Whenever possible, I conduct these observations under similar conditions.
I do not begin the exercise if I am feeling unwell, experiencing pain or dizziness, or if I am significantly fatigued.
Main procedure ME-001
The core concept of the experiment involves performing two actions simultaneously:
1. Physical exertion: Doing push-ups in front of a mirror, within the limits of your own physical capacity.
2. Focused gaze: Observing your own eyes in the reflection while exercising—to the extent that it remains comfortable and safe.
The initial plan specifies "N" push-ups. This is a starting parameter rather than a mandatory quota; you should not strive to reach a set number at the cost of pain, compromised form, or excessive strain.
You may blink. Do not force your gaze to remain fixed, hold your breath, or continue the exercise if you begin to feel unwell.
Observation after the exercise
Immediately upon finishing, I record my subjective sensations, then repeat the assessment a few minutes later.
I note both any changes and the absence thereof. I do not automatically interpret unusual sensations as evidence for the existence of a special energy.
When to stop
I stop the exercise if I experience pain, dizziness, unusual shortness of breath, vision disturbances, or significant discomfort. In the event of serious or persistent symptoms, I seek medical attention.
An important limitation
A single attempt is not sufficient to establish a cause-and-effect relationship. Analysis requires repeated observations, comparable conditions, and a comparison with alternative ways of execution.
Preparation
To begin, order an "original" (high-quality) mirror—a standard glass pane with a premium silver coating (amalgam) that ensures an accurate, distortion-free reflection and high moisture resistance. Next, ensure the mirror is positioned securely, and that there is sufficient clear space and a safe surface for performing the exercise.
I record the date, time, duration of sleep, physical well-being, mood, and level of fatigue. Whenever possible, I conduct these observations under similar conditions.
I do not begin the exercise if I am feeling unwell, experiencing pain or dizziness, or if I am significantly fatigued.
Main procedure ME-001
The core concept of the experiment involves performing two actions simultaneously:
1. Physical exertion: Doing push-ups in front of a mirror, within the limits of your own physical capacity.
2. Focused gaze: Observing your own eyes in the reflection while exercising—to the extent that it remains comfortable and safe.
The initial plan specifies "N" push-ups. This is a starting parameter rather than a mandatory quota; you should not strive to reach a set number at the cost of pain, compromised form, or excessive strain.
You may blink. Do not force your gaze to remain fixed, hold your breath, or continue the exercise if you begin to feel unwell.
Observation after the exercise
Immediately upon finishing, I record my subjective sensations, then repeat the assessment a few minutes later.
I note both any changes and the absence thereof. I do not automatically interpret unusual sensations as evidence for the existence of a special energy.
When to stop
I stop the exercise if I experience pain, dizziness, unusual shortness of breath, vision disturbances, or significant discomfort. In the event of serious or persistent symptoms, I seek medical attention.
An important limitation
A single attempt is not sufficient to establish a cause-and-effect relationship. Analysis requires repeated observations, comparable conditions, and a comparison with alternative ways of execution.
3. Observation Log ME-001
Each entry reflects a specific attempt to conduct an experiment. I fill out the log immediately after an observation, without altering the original notes based on any subsequent conclusions.
Observation card
Record number: ME-001-___
Date and time: ___
Conditions: ___
Duration of sleep the night before: ___
Well-being before starting: ___
Mood before starting: ___
Fatigue level before starting (0–10): ___
Execution parameters
State after exercise
Subjective sense of energy (0–10): ___
Level of fatigue (0–10): ___
Mood: ___
Level of concentration (0–10): ___
Physical sensations: ___
Unusual sensations or changes, if any: ___
State after a few minutes: ___
Preliminary conclusion
Logging principle
I do not fill in fields retroactively based on memory if it can be done immediately following an observation. I do not consider the absence of unusual sensations to be a failure; it, too, is a result.
An individual record describes an observation, but it does not, in itself, prove the existence of mirror energy.
Each entry reflects a specific attempt to conduct an experiment. I fill out the log immediately after an observation, without altering the original notes based on any subsequent conclusions.
Observation card
Record number: ME-001-___
Date and time: ___
Conditions: ___
Duration of sleep the night before: ___
Well-being before starting: ___
Mood before starting: ___
Fatigue level before starting (0–10): ___
Execution parameters
- Number of repetitions completed: ___
- Duration of the exercise: ___
- Gaze directed at the reflected eyes: continuous / intermittent / unable to maintain focus
- How you felt during the exercise: ___
- Reason for early termination, if applicable: ___
State after exercise
Subjective sense of energy (0–10): ___
Level of fatigue (0–10): ___
Mood: ___
Level of concentration (0–10): ___
Physical sensations: ___
Unusual sensations or changes, if any: ___
State after a few minutes: ___
Preliminary conclusion
- What exactly was observed, without an explanation as to why: ___
- What other factors might have influenced the experience: ___
- What should be checked during the next attempt: ___
Logging principle
I do not fill in fields retroactively based on memory if it can be done immediately following an observation. I do not consider the absence of unusual sensations to be a failure; it, too, is a result.
An individual record describes an observation, but it does not, in itself, prove the existence of mirror energy.
4. Comparison of conditions and analysis of results
Why compare the conditions?
To understand which factors might be linked to the observed changes, it is necessary to compare not only different attempts but also the conditions under which they took place.
A subjective sensation that arises during practice does not, in itself, reveal its own cause. Making comparisons helps to distinguish a personal impression from more consistent, underlying patterns.
Four research conditions
Condition A — Baseline state
Calm observation of one’s own state, without physical exercise or specific focus on a mirror.
Condition B — Physical exertion
Performing a physical exercise safely, without focusing on one’s reflected eyes.
Condition C — Observing the reflection
Calm observation of one’s own reflected eyes, without physical exertion.
Condition D — Combined activity
Simultaneously performing a physical exercise and focusing on one’s own reflected eyes — the core concept of ME-001.
Conditions should be compared within the limits of the participant’s physical capabilities. Differences in exertion, duration, and baseline state must be taken into account. If comparisons are made on different days, these circumstances should also be recorded.
What should be analyzed?
How should the results be interpreted?
If no differences are found: This is also a significant observation that should be noted.
If discrepancies are found: It is necessary to repeat the observations and examine alternative explanations.
If the results are contradictory: You need to describe the discrepancies, rather than selecting only those records that confirm your expectations.
Even persistent changes in one’s subjective state do not prove the existence of a new physical form of energy. Such a conclusion would require specific measurements and independent verification.
Final Principle
A theory must evolve alongside the data. An initial hypothesis may be refined, modified, or rejected based on the results of the research.
Why compare the conditions?
To understand which factors might be linked to the observed changes, it is necessary to compare not only different attempts but also the conditions under which they took place.
A subjective sensation that arises during practice does not, in itself, reveal its own cause. Making comparisons helps to distinguish a personal impression from more consistent, underlying patterns.
Four research conditions
Condition A — Baseline state
Calm observation of one’s own state, without physical exercise or specific focus on a mirror.
Condition B — Physical exertion
Performing a physical exercise safely, without focusing on one’s reflected eyes.
Condition C — Observing the reflection
Calm observation of one’s own reflected eyes, without physical exertion.
Condition D — Combined activity
Simultaneously performing a physical exercise and focusing on one’s own reflected eyes — the core concept of ME-001.
Conditions should be compared within the limits of the participant’s physical capabilities. Differences in exertion, duration, and baseline state must be taken into account. If comparisons are made on different days, these circumstances should also be recorded.
What should be analyzed?
- Does one’s subjective state differ depending on the conditions?
- Which changes recur, and which occur only once?
- Are these sensations linked to the intensity of physical exertion?
- Do mood, expectations, and fatigue influence the results?
- Are there any observations that cannot be explained by the initial hypothesis?
How should the results be interpreted?
If no differences are found: This is also a significant observation that should be noted.
If discrepancies are found: It is necessary to repeat the observations and examine alternative explanations.
If the results are contradictory: You need to describe the discrepancies, rather than selecting only those records that confirm your expectations.
Even persistent changes in one’s subjective state do not prove the existence of a new physical form of energy. Such a conclusion would require specific measurements and independent verification.
Final Principle
A theory must evolve alongside the data. An initial hypothesis may be refined, modified, or rejected based on the results of the research.
Authorship and status of the study
Author: creator of the theory of mirror energy.
ME-001 is part of the original research project "Theory of Mirror Energy." The protocol outlines the experimental design, the conditions under which it is conducted, observation parameters, and the principles for analyzing the results.
The protocol text and project materials evolve as observations accumulate. Any changes to hypotheses or methodology must be reflected in subsequent versions of the materials.
At what stage is the research?
At this stage, the initial idea and the observation procedure are described. As experiments are conducted, dated records, actual observations, comparisons, and conclusions will be added.
The results should not be claimed as confirmation of the theory until sufficient verification has been carried out.
Continue exploring the project
The main principle: keep a record of the work process, describe results transparently, and distinguish personal experience from verified conclusions.
Important! This is a scientific, philosophical, and research-oriented project; the materials provided do not constitute medical, psychological, or any other professional advice.
Author: creator of the theory of mirror energy.
ME-001 is part of the original research project "Theory of Mirror Energy." The protocol outlines the experimental design, the conditions under which it is conducted, observation parameters, and the principles for analyzing the results.
The protocol text and project materials evolve as observations accumulate. Any changes to hypotheses or methodology must be reflected in subsequent versions of the materials.
At what stage is the research?
At this stage, the initial idea and the observation procedure are described. As experiments are conducted, dated records, actual observations, comparisons, and conclusions will be added.
The results should not be claimed as confirmation of the theory until sufficient verification has been carried out.
Continue exploring the project
- The theory of mirror energy — its origins and core principles.
- Experiments — a description of the research program.
- Observation log — records documenting the progress of the research.
The main principle: keep a record of the work process, describe results transparently, and distinguish personal experience from verified conclusions.
Important! This is a scientific, philosophical, and research-oriented project; the materials provided do not constitute medical, psychological, or any other professional advice.
